Should journalists participate in the
rebranding of swine flu? “It is not a ‘swine’ flu, and people
need to stop calling it that,” Dave Warner of the National Pork
Producers Council told CNN. “They’re ruining people’s lives.”
Actually, under the rules of flu nomenclature, viruses are named
after where they are first found, according to this article in Food Manufacturing. That would make it Mexican flu. Right? No. Talk about ruining people’s lives.
When Stephen Harper suggested
Mexican flu, he wasn’t considering the racially-charged U.S.
political context. Now he’s made the switch
to H1N1, placating panicking
pork producers. But in the science blog Effect
Measure, scientists argue swine flu is still the most
scientifically appropriate name because the virus contains eight
genetic characteristics of swine, while H1N1 means nothing.
Certainly the citizens of La Gloria
to the pigs. This article
by Mike Davis in the Guardian argues that a poorly regulated
intensive pork industry is being let off the hook. Meanwhile, Rolling
Stone is laying first claim to the scoop, re-posting this 11-year-old
article about pandemics and giant pig barns on its web site.
As an aside, while looking into the flu
naming debate, Big Issue discovered Name
Wire, a blog dedicated entirely to discussion about naming
things, including the new flu. It’s a strange world.
Visit J-Source’s Covering Health Crises portal for resources, opinions and advice about covering this flu.
|77 Bloor St. West, Suite 600, Toronto, ON M5S 1M2|
|Charitable Registration No. 132489212RR0001|
Founded in 1990, The Canadian Journalism Foundation promotes, celebrates and facilitates excellence in journalism. The foundation runs a prestigious awards and fellowships program featuring an industry gala where news leaders…
Ⓒ2022 The Canadian Journalism Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
powered by codepxl
Leave a Reply