A reader asked this week why The Globe and Mail doesn’t use the official Olympic method of ranking countries when presenting medal counts.
A reader asked this week why The Globe and Mail doesn’t use the official Olympic method of ranking countries when presenting medal counts.
The Globe’s ranking is based on the total number of medals. In the case of a tie, the nod goes to whichever country has more gold, then silver, then bronze.
The Olympics ranking is based on the most gold medals won. In the case of a tie, more silver medals takes the next ranking.
Last Thursday morning, in the official Sochi medal count, Canada stood in seventh place. After the women’s curling team won gold, we moved into fifth and stayed there after the women’s hockey team won gold. Note that on the official tally Germany was third with eight gold, although it had fewer medals in total than Canada.
In The Globe’s method of counting, Canada was also fifth.
Neither method is perfect.
But the reader said, in an extreme example: “Under The Globe’s system, the country with 1 gold and 99 bronze medals is ranked higher (100 total medals) than the country with 1 gold and 1 silver (2 medals).”
I agree that is an extreme example, but in this case I would agree that 100 medals is more impressive than two, whatever the colour.
To
Related content on J-Source:
info@cjf-fjc.ca | |
77 Bloor St. West, Suite 600, Toronto, ON M5S 1M2 | |
(437) 783-5826 | |
Charitable Registration No. 132489212RR0001 |
Founded in 1990, The Canadian Journalism Foundation promotes, celebrates and facilitates excellence in journalism. The foundation runs a prestigious awards and fellowships program featuring an industry gala where news leaders…
Ⓒ2022 The Canadian Journalism Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
powered by codepxl